The heavy lifting of emissions control is already ensured by tough new EPA rules on interstate emissions and mercury control.

In West Virginia we have to have timbering, but the timber companies need to do what they do in a responsible way. This is a case about being a good neighbor and using property responsibly.

Once again, environmentalist scare-mongering seeks to undermine common-sense reforms that shore up our energy infrastructure.

The best advice is to acknowledge the degree of difficulty some face with energy prices, but then to highlight the significant investments that are made in expanding refining capacity and in exploration and production.

This is a missed opportunity for reform that would have made it easier to improve power plant efficiency and workplace safety, and that's bad news for consumers and the environment. We believe it is a step backwards for the protection of air quality in the United States.

The decision is a step backward in the protection of air quality in the United States.

Today's decision ... is disappointing. What benefit comes from today's decision? Certainly none for the environment.

Just because you are a big landowner doesn't give you the right to dump your garbage on the little landowner.

It is hard to see the justification for ratcheting the national PM standard lower at this point.

there is an emerging consensus that is hostile to the simplistic annual standard as the basis for triggering New Source Review.